Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal sparing liver resections for high tumour burden colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has proved effective in the treatment of oligometastatic disease (1 or 2 colorectal liver metastases CRLM) with similar long-term outcomes and improved short-term results compared to open liver resection (OLR). Feasibility of parenchymal sparing LLR for high tumour burden diseases is largely unknown. Aim of the study was to compare short and long-term results of LLR and OLR in patients with ≥ 3 CRLM. METHODS: Patients who underwent first LR of at least two different segments for ≥ 3 CRLM between 01/2012 and 12/2021 were analysed. Propensity score nearest-neighbour 1:1 matching was based on relevant prognostic factors. RESULTS: 277 out of 673 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria (47 LLR and 230 OLR). After match two balanced groups of 47 patients with a similar mean number of CRLM (5 in LLR vs 6.5 in OLR, p = 0.170) were analysed. The rate of major hepatectomy was similar between the two group (10.6% OLR vs. 12.8% LLR). Mortality (2.1% OLR vs 0 LLR) and overall morbidity rates (34% OLR vs 23.4% LLR) were comparable. Length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the LLR group (5 vs 9 days, p = 0.001). No differences were observed in median overall (41.1 months OLR vs median not reached LLR) and disease-free survival (18.3 OLR vs 27.9 months LLR). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic approach should be considered in selected patients scheduled to parenchymal sparing LR for high tumour burden disease as associated to shorter LOS and similar postoperative and long-term outcomes compared to the open approach.

Impact of extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma subtypes on surgical and oncological outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: There is little information about the relevance of extra-ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma (EDA) subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of EDA subtypes on surgical and oncological outcomes following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing PD for EDA from 2000 to 2019 were analyzed. Results were stratified by pathologic subtype (intestinal versus non-intestinal). Uni-and multivariable analyses were performed using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 70 patients, of whom 49 (70%) had an intestinal phenotype. EDA with intestinal phenotype was more frequently proximal to the Ampulla of Vater, while non-intestinal EDA was more frequently found distally (76% vs. 33%, p = 0.002). Patients with intestinal EDA were less likely to experience severe morbidity, with decreased reoperation and unplanned Intensive Care Unit admission rates relative to non-intestinal subtypes (2% vs. 29% p = 0.002, and 2% vs. 19%, p = 0.007, respectively). The median follow-up post-pancreatectomy was 73 months. Intestinal EDA was associated with improved overall and disease-free survival, with 3-year and 5-year survival rates of 71% vs. 29% and 53% vs. 24%, respectively. (p = 0.019 and p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Intestinal-type EDA, which more often arises from supra-ampullary duodenum, was associated with better postoperative outcomes and improved survival.

Pancreatoduodenectomy at the Verona Pancreas Institute: the Evolution of Indications, Surgical Techniques, and Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis of 3000 Consecutive Cases.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to critically reappraise the experience at our high-volume institution to obtain new insights for future directions. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The indications, surgical techniques, and perioperative management of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) have profoundly evolved over the last 20 years. METHODS: All consecutive PDs performed during the last 20 years at the Verona Pancreas Institute were divided into four 5-year timeframes and retrospectively analyzed in terms of indications, intraoperative features, and surgical outcomes. Significant milestones were provided to understand practice changes using a before-after analysis method. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 3000 patients. The median age, ASA ≥ 3 and number of nonbenchmark cases significantly increased over time ( P < 0.005). Pancreatic cancer was the leading indication, representing 60% of patients/year in the last timeframe, 40% of whom received neoadjuvant treatment. Conversely, after the development of International Guidelines, the proportion of resected cystic neoplasms progressively and thoroughly decreased. Given the increased complexity of surgery for pancreatic cancer, the evolution of technologies, surgical techniques, and postoperative management allowed the maintenance of favorable surgical outcomes over time, with a stable 20.0% of patients with a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3, an 11.7% failure to rescue and a 2.3% in-hospital mortality rate. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying was 22.4%, 13.4%, and 12.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PD significantly evolved in Verona over the past 2 decades. Surgeries of greater complexity are currently performed on increasingly frailer patients, mostly for pancreatic cancer and often after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, the progression of all fields of pancreatic surgery, including the expanding use of postoperative pancreatic fistula mitigation strategies, has allowed satisfactory outcomes to be maintained.